Contributions
to Contemporary Knowledge
Faculty of Social Sciences at South Asian
University initiated the annual program, ‘Contribution to Contemporary
Knowledge Lecture Series’ to execute the vision of synergetic regional and
global scholarship. This program envisages to bring eminent scholars from
anywhere in the world with an international reputation with regard to their
scholarship. First in the series was a public lecture by Prof. Gananath
Obeyesekere, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at Princeton University and
currently based in Sri Lanka, on 31 January at Teenmurty Auditorium. The enormous
scholarship of Prof. Obeyesekere encapsulates themes from mythology, history, culture
and religion in the framework of South Asia with a specific focus on Sri Lanka
and its historical intersections with India. The stature of Prof. Obeyesekere
evokes a certain kind of reverence and awe among scholars of the region. The
lecture was attended by many well-known scholars including historian Professor Romila
Thapar, amongst other noted social scientists from leading varsities and think tanks in Delhi.
The title of the lecture was, ‘The Coming of Brahmin Migrants:
The Sudra Fate of an Indian Elite in Sri Lanka’, which explored the shared history and
mythology of India and Sri Lanka. Prof. Obeyesekere noted the evolution of
Sinhala Buddhism as well as social and political structure with reference to
ancient texts and showed that Sinhala Buddhism has posterity of fusion of
religious and cultural motifs. It emerged from the lecture that the
contemporary version of Sinhala Buddhism, which has been a dominant component
of Sinhala society and politics, is not necessarily what the Buddha taught in
all of its elements, particularly when it comes to practice. It was rather a
consequence of syncretism and tolerant acceptance of elements from Brahmanic
rituals adopted from Brahmins who came to Sri Lanka in the distant past as well
as other elements of Hindu and local religiosity. An exclusivist notion of Sinhala
Buddhism is only a political invention to suit the agenda of identity politics
and propaganda of politically dominant sections of the polity.
Doing
ethnography Today
Doing Ethnography Today: An Interactive Workshop with Prof. Gananath Obeyesekere, chaired by Prof. Sasanka Perera. Photo credit: Nafees Jilani
|
As the second leg of the program, Faculty of
Social Sciences conducted a unique interactive workshop on 1st
February 2013 at Akbar Bhawan Campus of South Asian University in Chanakyapuri,
New Delhi. The workshop deliberated on the possibilities of doing ethnographic
studies in the context of contemporary South Asia with its multiple crises and
complexities. It emerged that ethnographic monographs can offer a mechanism to
overcome the identity politics rife in South Asia. Prof. Obeyesekere made it
clear that the notion of something being clearly ‘sociological’ is not a virtue
in the craft of ethnographic practice. According to him, social and academic
dogmatism cannot rule a creative ethnographer. An ethnographer should be aware
of his/her ignorance and hence there is a need for conjecture and creative
analysis within reasonable limits. No knowledge in ethnographic enterprise can
ever be absolute. More importantly, ethnographic knowledge production entails
intellectually fruitful fantasies. As noted by Prof Obeyesekere, without those
fantasies, anthropologists’ methods and techniques
become inflexible and canons begin to rein the minds of ethnographers. As such,
social scientists from South Asia run the risk of suffering from a kind of poverty
of imagination as they are consumed by canonical notions of doing research, in
the context of which they sacrifice intellectually necessary fantasies.
Responding to questions and observations by
teachers and students at South Asian University, Prof. Obeyesekere made it
clear that South Asian scholars have to continue with the efforts to break out
of the politics of anthropology, which has defined scholarship at the
international level. Reflecting upon his own intellectual dispute with anthropologist,
Marshal Sahlins, he indicated that there ought to be multiple disputes of this
kind in every epoch of history.
This year, both events were facilitated by
the Department of Sociology.
No comments:
Post a Comment