Image: Courtesy of Dev N. Pathak, Sociology, SAU.
About The Department - Vision and Beyond



Over the last half century or so, a vast body of knowledge(s) on the region has evolved within South Asia that mostly remain within the countries of their origin due to a number of reasons. In this specific context, there is a crucial need to share some of this knowledge in contemporary times when, despite assertions of localisations and mini-narratives, the universal does retain its emphasis through a constant dialectics of the two. The debate between the local and universal or mini-narratives and meta-narratives continue to rage, and is more clearly visible in the context of South Asian context. Even so, we are acutely aware of the non-existence of regular and serious forums for South Asian scholarship in social sciences to showcase our own research and thinking. We are also quite conscious of the fact that the process of establishing sociology in the region has created its own peculiarities which has established close inter-relationships between sociology and social anthropology, history, cultural studies, archeology and other related disciplines. We consider the porousness of South Asian sociology one of its most enduring strengths. On the other hand, we are not unaware of the unfortunate regressions sociology has experienced in different South Asian contexts over the last 30 years or so marked by numerous institutional failures.



It is within the context(s) outlined above that the Department of Sociology at South Asian university, initiated in 2011 witihn the Faculty of Social Sciences contributes to teaching, training and knowledge production. It is not intended to be a mere forum for the production of cutting-edge intellectual knowledge and exchange of that knowledge traversing across national borders in South Asia and beyond. Our expectation is that this knowledge would dislocate the persistence of an imposed framework emanating from the colonisation process and postcolonial politics of knowledge. Despite the passage of over fifty years since the process of official decolonization began in the region, much of the analyses of our problems, situations, histories and dynamics emanate from Euro American academia; this is certainly the case when it comes to conceptual formulations and theoretical approaches that are being employed in exploring the region’s social and cultural complexities often without much self-reflection.



The Department of Sociology strongly believes in the need to reformulate this situation by effectively centering South Asia without naively shunning thought from these established centers of knowledge be they in Europe or North America. We believe in an active and robust engagement with these issues within South Asia. In this context, through the work of its faculty and the research of graduate students, the Department would bring forward the newer forms of knowledge that comprehends and represents the South Asian context with a more authoritative and nuanced voice. We strongly believe in the need to actively intervene in the process of knowledge formation through a constant sharing of knowledge that the region produces as well as through interaction with the world beyond the region.



The courses taught in the Department as well as the research carried out by its faculty members reflect this overall vision and our collective commitment towards innovation, move beyond untenable stereotypes, and explore a new world of knowledge within the discipline of Sociology.


Class of 2011, Department of Sociology, South Asian University; Image: Courtesy of Dev N. Pathak, Sociology, SAU.

Monday, February 4, 2013

Report on 'Contribution to Contemporary Knowledge Lecture 2013' and 'Doing Ethnography Today' Workshop

Contributions to Contemporary Knowledge

Prof. Gananath Obeyeseekere at the podium, with chair, Prof. Patricia Uberoi (Former Professor of Sociology at Jawaharlal Nehru University and Vice Chairperson, Institute of Chinese Studies, New Delhi), Prof. Sasanka Perera (Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, South Asian University), and Prof. G K Chaddha (President, South Asian University). Photo bySreedeep

Faculty of Social Sciences at South Asian University initiated the annual program, ‘Contribution to Contemporary Knowledge Lecture Series’ to execute the vision of synergetic regional and global scholarship. This program envisages to bring eminent scholars from anywhere in the world with an international reputation with regard to their scholarship. First in the series was a public lecture by Prof. Gananath Obeyesekere, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at Princeton University and currently based in Sri Lanka, on 31 January at Teenmurty Auditorium. The enormous scholarship of Prof. Obeyesekere encapsulates themes from mythology, history, culture and religion in the framework of South Asia with a specific focus on Sri Lanka and its historical intersections with India. The stature of Prof. Obeyesekere evokes a certain kind of reverence and awe among scholars of the region. The lecture was attended by many well-known scholars including historian Professor Romila Thapar, amongst other noted social scientists from  leading varsities and think tanks in Delhi.

The title of the lecture was, ‘The Coming of Brahmin Migrants: The Sudra Fate of an Indian Elite in Sri Lanka’, which explored the shared history and mythology of India and Sri Lanka. Prof. Obeyesekere noted the evolution of Sinhala Buddhism as well as social and political structure with reference to ancient texts and showed that Sinhala Buddhism has posterity of fusion of religious and cultural motifs. It emerged from the lecture that the contemporary version of Sinhala Buddhism, which has been a dominant component of Sinhala society and politics, is not necessarily what the Buddha taught in all of its elements, particularly when it comes to practice. It was rather a consequence of syncretism and tolerant acceptance of elements from Brahmanic rituals adopted from Brahmins who came to Sri Lanka in the distant past as well as other elements of Hindu and local religiosity. An exclusivist notion of Sinhala Buddhism is only a political invention to suit the agenda of identity politics and propaganda of politically dominant sections of the polity.

Doing ethnography Today


Doing Ethnography Today: An Interactive Workshop with Prof. Gananath Obeyesekere, chaired by Prof. Sasanka Perera. Photo credit: Nafees Jilani
As the second leg of the program, Faculty of Social Sciences conducted a unique interactive workshop on 1st February 2013 at Akbar Bhawan Campus of South Asian University in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi. The workshop deliberated on the possibilities of doing ethnographic studies in the context of contemporary South Asia with its multiple crises and complexities. It emerged that ethnographic monographs can offer a mechanism to overcome the identity politics rife in South Asia. Prof. Obeyesekere made it clear that the notion of something being clearly ‘sociological’ is not a virtue in the craft of ethnographic practice. According to him, social and academic dogmatism cannot rule a creative ethnographer. An ethnographer should be aware of his/her ignorance and hence there is a need for conjecture and creative analysis within reasonable limits. No knowledge in ethnographic enterprise can ever be absolute. More importantly, ethnographic knowledge production entails intellectually fruitful fantasies. As noted by Prof Obeyesekere, without those fantasies,  anthropologists’ methods and techniques become inflexible and canons begin to rein the minds of ethnographers. As such, social scientists from South Asia run the risk of suffering from a kind of poverty of imagination as they are consumed by canonical notions of doing research, in the context of which they sacrifice intellectually necessary fantasies.

 Another aspect of the decline in the knowledge production is that market forces, agendas of international funding agencies and the state have become instrumental in research. This amalgamation of forces leaves no room for ethnographers to go beyond the easily available empirical details. Hence what emerges in the form of books often tends to be slightly more than reports. These reports are suitable for policy framing and planning. But they do not yield the necessary insights into the complex manifestations of the social, the cultural and the political. Social reality encapsulates a cobweb of complex meanings, such as the phenomena at Kataragama in Sri Lanka  as mentioned in his celebrated book titled, Medusa’s Hair. Unless that cobweb of meanings is unraveled in coherent, cogent, rational and sometimes poetic fashion, there can be no nuanced knowledge of society. To make knowledge all pervasive, it is instrumental to bring in intuition and fantasies, going beyond the Cartesian claims of scientific rationality, and capture the complex lives of the people.

Responding to questions and observations by teachers and students at South Asian University, Prof. Obeyesekere made it clear that South Asian scholars have to continue with the efforts to break out of the politics of anthropology, which has defined scholarship at the international level. Reflecting upon his own intellectual dispute with anthropologist, Marshal Sahlins, he indicated that there ought to be multiple disputes of this kind in every epoch of history.

 It became evident on both days that Prof. Obeyesekere is one of the most sought after social anthropologists in India as well as the region. The teeming numbers of young and older scholars who attended both events and engaged with him was a clear recognition of his scholarly persona.  

 ‘Contribution to Contemporary Knowledge Lecture Series’ will continue to generate new insights in the knowledge production and transaction at this two-year-old university, which was begun by SAARC in 2010 .

This year, both events were facilitated by the Department of Sociology.

No comments:

Post a Comment