THIS IS THE OFFICIAL BLOG OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY, NEW DELHI. IT CONTAINS INFORMATION ABOUT THE DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS NEWS ON REGULAR EVENTS HOSTED BY THE DEPARTMENT. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US BY TELEPHONE, EMAIL OR REGULAR POST.
Image: Courtesy of Dev N. Pathak, Sociology, SAU.
About The Department - Vision and Beyond
Over the last half century or so, a vast body of knowledge(s) on the region has evolved within South Asia that mostly remain within the countries of their origin due to a number of reasons. In this specific context, there is a crucial need to share some of this knowledge in contemporary times when, despite assertions of localisations and mini-narratives, the universal does retain its emphasis through a constant dialectics of the two. The debate between the local and universal or mini-narratives and meta-narratives continue to rage, and is more clearly visible in the context of South Asian context. Even so, we are acutely aware of the non-existence of regular and serious forums for South Asian scholarship in social sciences to showcase our own research and thinking. We are also quite conscious of the fact that the process of establishing sociology in the region has created its own peculiarities which has established close inter-relationships between sociology and social anthropology, history, cultural studies, archeology and other related disciplines. We consider the porousness of South Asian sociology one of its most enduring strengths. On the other hand, we are not unaware of the unfortunate regressions sociology has experienced in different South Asian contexts over the last 30 years or so marked by numerous institutional failures.
It is within the context(s) outlined above that the Department of Sociology at South Asian university, initiated in 2011 witihn the Faculty of Social Sciences contributes to teaching, training and knowledge production. It is not intended to be a mere forum for the production of cutting-edge intellectual knowledge and exchange of that knowledge traversing across national borders in South Asia and beyond. Our expectation is that this knowledge would dislocate the persistence of an imposed framework emanating from the colonisation process and postcolonial politics of knowledge. Despite the passage of over fifty years since the process of official decolonization began in the region, much of the analyses of our problems, situations, histories and dynamics emanate from Euro American academia; this is certainly the case when it comes to conceptual formulations and theoretical approaches that are being employed in exploring the region’s social and cultural complexities often without much self-reflection.
The Department of Sociology strongly believes in the need to reformulate this situation by effectively centering South Asia without naively shunning thought from these established centers of knowledge be they in Europe or North America. We believe in an active and robust engagement with these issues within South Asia. In this context, through the work of its faculty and the research of graduate students, the Department would bring forward the newer forms of knowledge that comprehends and represents the South Asian context with a more authoritative and nuanced voice. We strongly believe in the need to actively intervene in the process of knowledge formation through a constant sharing of knowledge that the region produces as well as through interaction with the world beyond the region.
The courses taught in the Department as well as the research carried out by its faculty members reflect this overall vision and our collective commitment towards innovation, move beyond untenable stereotypes, and explore a new world of knowledge within the discipline of Sociology.
Over the last half century or so, a vast body of knowledge(s) on the region has evolved within South Asia that mostly remain within the countries of their origin due to a number of reasons. In this specific context, there is a crucial need to share some of this knowledge in contemporary times when, despite assertions of localisations and mini-narratives, the universal does retain its emphasis through a constant dialectics of the two. The debate between the local and universal or mini-narratives and meta-narratives continue to rage, and is more clearly visible in the context of South Asian context. Even so, we are acutely aware of the non-existence of regular and serious forums for South Asian scholarship in social sciences to showcase our own research and thinking. We are also quite conscious of the fact that the process of establishing sociology in the region has created its own peculiarities which has established close inter-relationships between sociology and social anthropology, history, cultural studies, archeology and other related disciplines. We consider the porousness of South Asian sociology one of its most enduring strengths. On the other hand, we are not unaware of the unfortunate regressions sociology has experienced in different South Asian contexts over the last 30 years or so marked by numerous institutional failures.
It is within the context(s) outlined above that the Department of Sociology at South Asian university, initiated in 2011 witihn the Faculty of Social Sciences contributes to teaching, training and knowledge production. It is not intended to be a mere forum for the production of cutting-edge intellectual knowledge and exchange of that knowledge traversing across national borders in South Asia and beyond. Our expectation is that this knowledge would dislocate the persistence of an imposed framework emanating from the colonisation process and postcolonial politics of knowledge. Despite the passage of over fifty years since the process of official decolonization began in the region, much of the analyses of our problems, situations, histories and dynamics emanate from Euro American academia; this is certainly the case when it comes to conceptual formulations and theoretical approaches that are being employed in exploring the region’s social and cultural complexities often without much self-reflection.
The Department of Sociology strongly believes in the need to reformulate this situation by effectively centering South Asia without naively shunning thought from these established centers of knowledge be they in Europe or North America. We believe in an active and robust engagement with these issues within South Asia. In this context, through the work of its faculty and the research of graduate students, the Department would bring forward the newer forms of knowledge that comprehends and represents the South Asian context with a more authoritative and nuanced voice. We strongly believe in the need to actively intervene in the process of knowledge formation through a constant sharing of knowledge that the region produces as well as through interaction with the world beyond the region.
The courses taught in the Department as well as the research carried out by its faculty members reflect this overall vision and our collective commitment towards innovation, move beyond untenable stereotypes, and explore a new world of knowledge within the discipline of Sociology.
Class of 2011, Department of Sociology, South Asian University; Image: Courtesy of Dev N. Pathak, Sociology, SAU.
Friday, February 21, 2014
Friday, February 14, 2014
The Freed Kamaiya movement in western Nepal
SociologySeminar Series 2014Winter Semester
The Freed Kamaiya movement in western Nepal:A fieldwork-based
account
By Dr. Michael Hoffmann
Max Plank Institute for Social Anthropology
Chair: Dr. Ankur Datta
Michael
Hoffmann is an anthropologist who has conducted fieldwork in Nepal. He is
interested in economic and political anthropology, work and labour,
Inequality, Maoism and anthropology of revolutions.
Date, time and place:
19 February 2014, Wednesday
19 February 2014, Wednesday
Time: 02.30 PM
Mezzanine Hall, South Asian University,
Akbar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri,
New Delhi 110021
ALL ARE CORDIALLY INVITED
(Please
have your mobile phones switched off during lecture and discussion)
Friday, January 31, 2014
SAU Sociology: Cinema and Society Series -2014 - My Mother India
My Mother India
![]() |
| Image from: http://www.ucfilms.in/subject/culture/my-mother-india/ |
'My
Mother India' is a passionate film told by the child of a mixed marriage and
set against the tumultuous backdrop of modern Indian history. With an Indian father who collects kitch calendars, an
Australian mother who hangs her knickers out to dry in front of the horrified
Indian neighbours, a grandfather who
was a self-styled Guru and a fiercely man-hating grandmother - it is no wonder
that Safina Uberoi made a film about
her family! What begins as a quirky
and humorous documentary about an eccentric, multicultural upbringing unfolds
into a complex commentary on the social, political and religious events of the
anti-Sikh riots of 1984 which tore this family apart.
AWARDS RECEIVED: CRC Award, Dendy Awards – Sydney Film
Festival 2002, Script Writing Award, NSW Premier's Literary Awards 2002, Best
Long Form Documentary, Australian Teachers of Media Awards 2002, Odyssey Award
for Best Documentary, Real: Life On Film Festival 2002, Jury Prize for Best
Australian Documentary, Australian Film Critics Circle 2002, Special Jury
Award, Hawaii International Film Festival 2001, Special Commendation, Mill
Valley International Film Festival 2001, Best Video Production, Melbourne
International Film Festival 2001, Best Pitch, Heidtman/AFTRS Award 1998
DATE: Tuesday, 4 February, 2014
TIME: 2:30 – 4:15 pm
VENUE: FSI Hall, Akbar Bhawan
Director
Safina Uberoi will discuss the
film and answer your questions after the screening
All are welcome
Please have you mobile phones switched off during the film and dicuission
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Sociology Seminar Series 2013-14
Inhabiting ‘Childhood’ in
Postcolonial India
By Sarada Balagopalan,
Associate Professor, Centre
for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), New Delhi
Chair:
Diya Mehra, Department of Sociology, South Asian University, New Delhi
This paper discusses street
children’s lives in relation to the local materialization of a global politics of
‘childhood’. The street child -- at once ‘victim’ and yet highly ‘agential’--
signals a certain messiness around assumed vectors of age, care, ability and
innocence that this normative ‘childhood’ register works with. Through
capturing a moment in which global, national and local efforts combined to
improve and transform these children’s lives through school enrolment and new
discourses of ‘children's rights’, this paper focuses on the complexity and
contemporaneity of their extensive practices of dwelling generated by the
exigencies of survival within postcolonial ‘development’. It considers whether
these practices of dwelling - which can neither be dissolved through a
‘cultural’ reading of these children’s lives nor resolved within a more
technocratic policy norm – might be a productive opening to re-thinking
‘childhood’ more generally.
Sarada Balagopalan is on the
editorial board of the journal Childhood: A Journal of Global Child Research
and has published in several journals including EPW and Contemporary
Education Dialogue. She is the author of Inhabiting ‘Childhood’:
Children, Labour and Schooling in Postcolonial India.
Date: 29 January 2014, Wednesday
Time and Venue: 02.30 PM
FSI Hall, Ground Floor, South
Asian University,
Akbar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri,
New Delhi 110021
ALL ARE CORDIALLY INVITED
(Please have your mobile phones switched off during lecture and
discussion)
Friday, January 17, 2014
Sociology Seminar Series 2014
Sociology Seminar
Series 2014
Winter
Semester 2014
Schedule for the Semester
|
Date
|
Title
|
Presenter
|
|
29 January
|
Inhabiting
‘Childhood’ in Postcolonial India
|
Sarada Balagopalan, Centre
for the Study of Developing Societies
|
|
12 February
|
Mapping London: Somali
Women in Public Space
|
Hudita Nura Mustafa,
Independent Scholar
|
|
19 February
|
The freed Kamaiya movement in western Nepal: a
fieldwork-based account
|
Michael Hoffman, Max Plank
Institute for Social Anthropology
|
|
5 March
|
Community
identity, cosmopolitanism and the city- being Anglo-Indian and Chinese in
Calcutta/Kolkata
|
Jayani Bonnerjee, Centre de
Sciences Humaines
|
|
26 March
|
Subordinate Spatialities: Historicizing Housing,
Language and Identity
in Wagdara: A Kolam Village in Wardha, India |
Venugopal Maddipati,
Ambedkar University Delhi
|
|
2 April
|
Sudden
Selves: ‘Personality Development', Tupperware and the Making of New Labour in
North India
|
Sanjay Srivastava,
Institute of Economic Growth
|
|
16 April
|
"You Call Yourself Gay Because You're
Hifi": Critiquing The Political Economy of Sexuality in South Asia
|
Svati Shah, University of Massachusetts,
Amherst
|
Coordinated by Ankur Datta and Diya Mehra
Time: 02.30 PM
Venue:
FSI Hall, Ground Floor, South Asian University,
Akbar Bhawan, Chanakyapuri,
ALL ARE CORDIALLY INVITED
Department
of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences,
Akbar Bhawan, South Asian
University, Chankayapuri, New Delhi 110021
Phone:
24122512; 24122513; 24122514
Official
Departmental Blog: http://sociology-sau.blogspot.in/
Sociology Students’ Blog:
https://sausociology.wordpress.com/
Saturday, October 12, 2013
‘Conditions of Knowing’: An Interdisciplinary Workshop on Theory and Methodology
Workshop
As an initiative of the Faculty of Social Sciences, an
interdisciplinary workshop on the matter of ‘theory and methodology in the social
sciences’ has been planned for the 24 , 28 and 31 October 2013 from 4.30 pm to 6.30 pm at the Mezzanine Floor and FSI Hall of South Asian University. While research students undergo courses in theory and methodology,
how do they relate these two programmes together? What are the challenges in
bridging the seeming gap between theory and methodology? How do students and
the faculty who conduct classes on these two topics really understand theory
and methodology? Can a conversation on these two crucial themes be initiated
between proponents of different social science disciplines?
The workshop is aimed at
PhD students and academic colleagues in the Faculty of Social Sciences. We hope
that this workshop will initiate conversations between departments in the
Faculty of Social Sciences and foster a climate of interdisciplinary engagement
among colleagues and students. Followup events planned fr 2014 and beyond will be open to wider academic participation.
Preamble
The pursuit of scholarship
involves a number of interests ranging from the pragmatic, to the normative or
positivist state of things to the political. The existence of numerous
disciplines which fall under the broad rubric of the social sciences
contributes to this complexity. Often, the structure of social science
disciplines as they are taught is extremely dependant on the composition and
approach of a concerned department. For example, the University of Chicago
houses Departments of Sociology, Anthropology and Economics which stand out for
promoting particular agendas, hence giving rise to schools of thought in those
fields. Perhaps one of the greatest sources of complexity and strength in
social science scholarship is the diversity of approaches, areas of interest
and styles of teaching and pedagogy across departments.
At the core of every social
science discipline, especially as they are broken down into teachable
components for students, there appear to be two universals: theory and methodology.
The question of theory is often regarded to be central to any discipline.
Methodology is considered critical to the pursuit and the craft of knowledge. Yet,
these two components of scholarship are subject to continuous debate. Students
and faculty members in the social sciences are often faced with a situation whereby
theory and/or methodology are fetishized, leading to an unproductive divide
between what is imagined to be theoretical and the empirical.
The social sciences are marked by
the diversity of ways of doing research. Sociological research alone often includes
scholarship facilitated by quantitative research methods, ethnography, case
studies and archival research among others. Scholarship in International
Relations demonstrates diversity of both methods and of theoretical approaches
from related disciplines of Political Science, History and Political Economy. However, methodology may often be
misunderstood for a fetishization of methods.
On the whole, regardless of the
disciplinary perspective and approaches we may employ, a conversation across
disciplines on matters of theory and methodology is crucial as it shapes the conditions
of knowing.
Format
The format of the workshop will
consist of three panels to be conducted over three days after teaching hours:
The first two panels will deal with concerns of methodology and theory for the
two constituent departments of the Faculty of Social Sciences: Sociology and
International Relations. Each of these
sessions will feature short presentations of notes shared by faculty members on
theory and methodology. The faculty members will then be followed by
presentations made by the PhD students of each department. Each presentation
will last 10-15 minutes. The end of each panel will be followed by a session
for questions from the audience addressed to panellists.
The third panel will consist of a roundtable
session bringing together all faculty members from the two departments of the
Faculty of Social Sciences.
Panel I-Sociology
Date: 24.10.13 Time: 4.30pm-6pm
Chair: Dr. Dev Pathak
Name
|
Topic
|
Time
|
Ankur Datta
|
Notes on Theory
|
10 min
|
Chudamani Basnet
|
Notes on Methodology
|
10 min
|
Krishna Pandey
|
Student Intervention
|
15 min
|
Kumud Bhansal
|
Student Intervention
|
15 min
|
Question and Answer Session
|
20 Minutes
|
Panel II- International Relations
Date: 28.10.2013 Time: 4.30pm-6pm
Venue: FSI Hall
Chair: Prof. Rajen Harshe
Name
|
Topic
|
Time
|
Siddharth Mallavarapu
|
Notes on Theory
|
10 min
|
Jayashree Vivekanandan
|
Notes on Methodology
|
10 min
|
Vaishali Raghuvanshi
|
Student Intervention
|
15 min
|
Omar Sadr
|
Student Intervention
|
15 min
|
Anu Krishna SS
|
Student Intervention
|
15 Min
|
Question and Answer Session
|
20 Minutes
|
Panel-III- Round Table-Involving faculty members from the
departments of International Relations and Sociology
Date: 31.10.2013
Time: 4.30pm-6pm
Venue: Mezzanine Floor
Chair: Prof. S. Perera, Dean FSS
Agenda for the Round Table
What can students and practitioners in the disciplines of Sociology and International Relations learn from each other?
Is there a gap between theory
and methodology in the Social Sciences? If so, can this gap be bridged?
What can students and practitioners in the disciplines of Sociology and International Relations learn from each other?
What do we understand by the ‘conditions
of knowing’?
Workshop and Series Coordinators
Ankur
Datta, Department of Sociology.
Siddharth Mallavarapu, Department
of International Relations.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




